February 11, 2008
Management by measure can kill
I make no apologies for once again urging you to read Simon Caulkin's column in last Sunday's Observer. As so often he highlights a significant piece of research which casts doubt on some of the crude management clichés that get spouted as if they represent deep wisdom. I have include a long chunk of his piece, because I believe it contains a lesson we need to absorb and act with some speed. So, please read the extract and then go to the source:
As the paper observes: 'It seems unlikely that hospitals deliberately set out to decrease survival rates. What is more likely is that in response to competitive pressures on costs, hospitals cut services that affected [heart-attack] mortality rates, which were unobserved, in order to increase other activities which buyers could better observe.'
In other words, what gets measured, matters. Measures set up incentives that drive people's behaviour. And woe to the organisation when that behaviour is at odds with its purpose. Imagine the cost to NHS morale (one of Deming's unknown and unknowable figures) of the knowledge that managing to the measure resulted in more deaths - the grotesque opposite of its aims. Hospitals are the extreme example of a general case. As such, they allow us a definitive rephrasing of our least favourite management mantra. What gets measured gets managed - so be sure you have the right measures, because the wrong ones kill."
Posted by richard at February 11, 2008 10:57 AMIts good to read this; it's a drum I've been banging for a long time - "You get what you measure."
As well as that I've often discussed the things that you can recognise but can't necessarily measure: I know when I feel like a satisfied customer, and it isn't from any specific metric that I or any company could devise. Even so, I know which companies I want to stay with
Thanks for the comment, Jo. It's something I bang on about too.
Posted by: richard oliver at February 27, 2008 02:34 PM